http://www.gigoblog.com/2006/12/12/apples-virtualization-master-plan/ WTMB. WYSIWYG (YABB), but YKTD: GIGO. Sun, 23 Nov 2008 17:16:43 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 http://www.gigoblog.com/2006/12/12/apples-virtualization-master-plan/#comment-3466 Application Agnosticism - blog.scottlowe.org - The weblog of an IT pro specializing in virtualization, storage, and servers Wed, 10 Sep 2008 01:24:21 +0000 http://www.gigoblog.com/2006/12/12/apples-virtualization-master-plan/#comment-3466 [...] run Windows applications on their Macs. A number of others have written about this possibility; see here and here for more information. And let’s not discount WINE, which currently runs on Linux and [...] [...] run Windows applications on their Macs. A number of others have written about this possibility; see here and here for more information. And let’s not discount WINE, which currently runs on Linux and [...]

]]> http://www.gigoblog.com/2006/12/12/apples-virtualization-master-plan/#comment-48 Mista Carruth Tue, 19 Dec 2006 18:16:27 +0000 http://www.gigoblog.com/2006/12/12/apples-virtualization-master-plan/#comment-48 Interesting, to say the least. I have never been all that familiar with the early days of Apple, so hearing about the NeXT solution and the various "boxes" proved to be an enlightening read. As for replacing Windows...isn't that what OS X is? Cannibalism isn't the best vehicle for expanding market share. But you are right when you say, "It’s a trivial thing for Apple, once capable of running all software from within the Mac OS interface, to offer Mac OS as a replacement for Windows." Either way, I suppose this isn't quite the death knell for Parallels...but, I do think that the company will have a very limited second-life if Apple integrates virtualization. Interesting, to say the least. I have never been all that familiar with the early days of Apple, so hearing about the NeXT solution and the various “boxes” proved to be an enlightening read. As for replacing Windows…isn’t that what OS X is? Cannibalism isn’t the best vehicle for expanding market share. But you are right when you say, “It’s a trivial thing for Apple, once capable of running all software from within the Mac OS interface, to offer Mac OS as a replacement for Windows.” Either way, I suppose this isn’t quite the death knell for Parallels…but, I do think that the company will have a very limited second-life if Apple integrates virtualization.

]]>